THE VARIOUS THEORIES BROUGHT TO DENY THE HISTORIC CHARACTER OF THE RESURRECTION

Standard
http://www.the-truth-ministries.us/English_Resurrection.the-truth-ministries.us/

Translation from French to English
made by Marie Buchanan, M.Ps.

Marie M. Buchanan, Copyright 2008
Unknown author.
All rights are reserved in English and French.
Permission
is hereby granted to anyone to quote in English or French from “The
Various Theories to Deny the Historic Character of The Resurrection”,
in small portions only, for non-commercial use provided if there is no
content change, and full credit is given to the author, including the
website and contact information.
To quote or publish larger
portions in English or French for commercial use, permission from the
author must be granted in advance. Reproduction of this document, be it
in regular booklet form or on a CD/PDF, in part or in full, by
electronic or any other means for commercial or private purposes, is
strictly prohibited.



THE VARIOUS THEORIES BROUGHT TO DENY THE HISTORIC CHARACTER OF THE RESURRECTION:

JESUS’ RESURRECTION – INTRODUCTION:

A BRIEF HISTORY:

In
the beliefs of the antiquity, there was the myths of the Resurrection
linked to the cycle of the seasons. On the other hand, one does not
find nothing comparable to the proclamation of the apostles and writing
according to which a man, Jesus of Nazareth was dead and overcame the
death while coming back to life to reign eternally on a new creation
get rid of sin, sufferings and death. The New Testament, filled with a
hope based on the Resurrection of Christ and of his faith in our own
Resurrection, contrast sharply with general despair facing the death
that characterized the beliefs in this era. The Greeks believed in
immortality seen as the delivery of the impede that constitutes the
physical body; the Jews expected to return world of the deaths in their
same body. While Christian hope was the one of a transformed body able
to express personal life in the age to come.

THE RESURRECTION: BASIC DOCTRINE OF CHRISTIANITY:


One
confuses often today the Resurrection with the maintenance of the
personal existence after the death. While the Resurrection hears the
maintenance of the existence (the soul) after the death, it implies for
the person the recuperation of a body. To be raised from the death, is
to receive again a body, this is to be reintroduced by God in the
concrete world, in the material world. Once resurrected, we do not know
the death anymore. According to the Bible, we have only one life to
live in this body marked by the sin and the death. Therefore, we die
only once. Now, this life that passes under the assessment of God about
the good or the evil that one will have done being in this body
determines our eternity.

For
Christianity, the physical Resurrection of Christ is extremely
important. (1 Cor. 15, 12-19) The Whole Christian Faith depends on it.
The apostle Paul, in his epistles, showed that all is based on the
bodily Resurrection of Christ. If there is no Resurrection he says, the
apostles are false witnesses, the predication of the Christians is
vain, their faith also and they are without hope for the future. For
the Christian, the Resurrection testifies the deity of Jesus-Christ, it
is the sign by excellence of His divinity. It gives all the meaning of
his life and to his message. It validates His affirmations of incarnate
God, Savior of the humanity and as coming judge of the world. According
to Paul, the Resurrection of Jesus removed the power of the death and
to the tomb his ultimate victory on life. In His death-Resurrection
event, Jesus constitutes the first example of this that which will
become reality for all the believers.

VARIOUS THEORIES BROUGHT TO DENY THE HISTORIC CHARACTER OF THE RESURRECTION:

1ST THEORY: “THE HALLUCINATION”


The
theory of the hallucination suggests that all the apparitions of Christ
after the Resurrection were only hallucinatory deceptions. The people
who have claimed to see Christ are seen as having hallucinations. This
theory supposes that the grave always were occupied enters in
contradiction with certain conditions (principles) that must be met to
allow a hallucination to produce itself:

1st weakness of the
theory: theory that indisputably the first principle that says that
usually, uniquely certain persons have hallucinations – usually
paranoiacs and (especially) schizophrenics. Now, in the New Testament,
there is all kinds of persons having had different experiences, a
different education and being in different dispositions.

2nd
weakness of the theory: the second principle enunciates that the
hallucinations are linked to the subconscious of a person and to its
previous experiences. It is not very likely that two persons, or more,
can have the same hallucination at the same time.

Christ
appeared to a lot of persons and the descriptions of these apparitions
contain a lot of details that the psychologists consider, determined by
the reality. The supporters of this theory seem to forget that a
hallucination is a private event, a subjective experience empties of
all external references, empties of all objects. Thus, if two persons
cannot create or keep the same vision without any object external
reference, that is impossible that 500 persons, hallucinate the same
thing and at the same time (Christ appeared simultaneously to 500
persons stipulates Paul in his first epistle to the Corinthians).

3rd
weakness of the theory: ordinarily, the hallucinations can take place
whenever or wherever. In the New Testament, the circumstances of a
hallucination are lacking. The mentioned apparitions are a lot more
than only simple momentary visions, the time there plays a role: 15
different apparitions – of which to more than 500 persons. Besides,
these apparitions present themselves under a big variety of time and
places.

4th weakness of the theory: the hallucinations
required of the subjects an expectative spirit or of hope that does
their desires generate certain thoughts. Now, the last thing that the
disciples awaited was a Resurrection: they thought that Christ had been
crucified, buried and that all was finished. Mary Magdala, while going
to the tomb the first Sunday to carry the spices that she had prepared
to embalm with fragrance the body of Jesus, evidently did not expect to
discover Him risen from the death. When at last the Lord appeared to
His disciples, they had fear and believed to see a ghost.

5th
weakness of the theory: the hallucinations habitually takes place
during a long period and on a regularly basis. In the New Testament,
the apparitions stopped abruptly. They stopped themselves all at the
same moment.

2ND THEORY: “BODY STOLEN BY THE DISCIPLES”


This
theory supports that the disciples would have invented a Resurrection
by stealing the body of Jesus and that they accepted dying martyrs for
a lie.

Here a theory that would not hold in front of a justice
court. One supposes that the disciples would have come to steal the
body of Jesus while the roman guard slept. Now, if the roman guard
really had slept, how could he have known that the disciples had stolen
the body? The defense lawyer would have liked to undergo a
cross-examination to the captain of the guard.

It is
impossible that the soldiers slept. The fear of the punishment caused
them to be very careful with their orders, especially in the night. The
Roman security unit was a war machine; if the disciples had attempted
something, there would have been a fight of six seconds (just one
soldier easily could have mastered the whole group of the disciples).
It is necessary to remember that when Jesus was stopped in the Garden!
of Gethsemane, all the disciples abandoned him and fled. In the New
Testament, these are described not as intrigues, but as knocked out
men, discouraged, that hid fearing themselves for their life.

And
then, there is the question of the huge rock of about two tons that
closed the entry of the tomb. The position of this last one – rolled to
a certain distance of the sepulcher – makes the idea difficult since
the soldiers would have slept despite of all this noise. Over all, this
hypothesis does not agree to the lesser of the world, with that we know
of the character of the apostles. These people were too honest to
commit such trickery. This action would contrast with all is written
about them (these men of high morality and of honor). According to the
doctor J. N. D. Anderson, Leading Juridical Expert in Great Britain,
the theory does not give explanation to the touching transformation
that operated itself in them and that changed from to being depressed
and discouraged in witnesses that nothing could stop.

That did
not resemble any of them to imagine a blow of this kind, or to have
enough shrewdness and of rapidity decision to execute it without
anybody noticing it. Even if such had been the case, the history of
Christianity would have taken a different turn. Sooner or later, one or
the other of the eleven men having taken part in the abduction of the
body would have, by clumsiness or otherwise, revealed the secret. More,
a moral structure of the breadth of the primitive church established,
as this church was, on long persecutions and of unspeakable sufferings,
could not have established its doctrine on a lie.

In the last
analysis, why the disciples would have wanted to give the impression
that Christ was risen from the dead while they did not expect his
Resurrection? Also, who could believe that these men were confronted to
later persecutions, while knowing their faith was based on a deception?

3RD THEORY: "BODY STOLEN BY AUTHORITIES"

Here,
Roman authorities and Jews would have taken the body and would have
deposited the body in a safe place, in order to prevent whoever to
claim that there had been Resurrection.

Face has such an
hypothesis, one cannot do otherwise than to ask the following question:
Why would authorities have done the only thing that could create
problems to them? The disciples had returned in the middle of the city
of Jerusalem and preached Christ rose from the death. If what they
proclaimed was false, it would have sufficed to show the body to
contradict them. Where was the official denial? Why authorities did not
say: “This is an absurdity. We gave the order to move the body".

If
that had been insufficient, why would they not have called as witnesses
those that had moved the body? Or why would they not have put the body
of Christ on a cart and displayed it all over Jerusalem? This spectacle
would have killed the Christianity before its beginning. The only
possible answer to this question is that the authorities were not able
to produce the body. They had absolutely no clue to allow them to have
the knowledge of where the body was.

Yes,
when the apostles began to preach the Resurrection, it would have
sufficed for the authorities to show the body to refute the Christian
proclamation, but they did not do it…

4th THEORY: "THE FAINTING" (OR THEORY OF INTENSIVE CARE)

According
to this theory, Jesus was not really dead on the cross. It is true that
he was nailed to it and suffered shock, pains and bleeding, but instead
of dying he fainted of exhaustion. Thinking that he was dead his
disciples buried him alive. The medical knowledge of the era was not
very well developed; it was easy for them to be mistaken. The cold of
the tomb where Christ was placed woke him up from the coma. His
disciples were so ignorant that they could not believe of a simple
intensive care; that is why they supported that it was a matter of a
Resurrection.

This theory forgets certain facts:

1. Jesus undergoes six legal proceedings – three Roman and three Jewish proceedings.
2. It was inflicted on him the torture of the Roman flagellation.
3. He was so weak that he did not have the strength to carry his "patibulum” – i.e. the transversal bar of the cross.
4. They nailed him in the hands (or wrists) and feet to crucify him.
5.
The Roman pierced his side from a blow of a spear and the witnesses
said: "It came out water and blood", which is a death sign.
6.
Four butchers confirmed his death. The Roman teams in charge of the
crucifixion knew their job. They had enough practice on others.
7.
More than 100 pounds of spices and of sticky substances were placed all
over his body. (could he have breathed through that?)
8. He was placed in a cold and humid grave.
9. A big rock was rolled in front of the entry.
10. A Roman guard was placed in front of the grave.

According
to this theory, an unbelievable thing happened: the cold and humid air
of the grave would have reanimated Christ instead of killing him (by
pneumonia alone). He tore his shroud, pushed the rock in the entry,
pushed back the guards and little time after, appeared to his disciples
as Lord of life.

Indeed, this theory does not hold any account
of the mortal character of the inflicted wound to Jesus, frightful
mutilation of the hands (or wrists) and feet, the exhaustion due to
heavy bleeding, of absence of any human assistance during the most
critical moments where they would have been essential, firmly tight
shroud around the body, and the heavy rock that closed the entry of the
tomb. It suffices to represent a human body, bleeding from five open
wounds lying on the cold rock of a tomb, without human relief of any
type, to understand to which extent this assumption is not reasonable.


IN CONCLUSION:

Less
than twenty years following the death and Resurrection of Christ, the
word of the fishermen of Galilee shook even in deeper more seated
temple of Judaism and its echoes resounded all alongside the Eastern
Coast of the Mediterranean. Then, it began to become a serious threat
for the Roman Empire. The Christian Church recruited the mass of its
first adherents not among the foreigners that came to pass some days or
some weeks in Jerusalem for a holiday, but in the permanent population
of the city. The enemies of the faith were paralyzed. Several high
persons would have certainly sacrificed a part of their fortune to
annihilate this movement if it had been possible.

By a strange
whim of luck, the disciples were brought to begin their campaign that
was scarcely a 15 minute of walk to the place of, if their pretentions
were not to have been founded, the remains of their Master was buried
in a easily accessible cave. The question could be solved immediately
and by testimonies of a limited number of people. Besides, it is
necessary to take in consideration that when the disciples of Jesus
proclaimed the Resurrection, they did it as eyewitnesses while the
people that had been in communication with the events of which they
spoke were alive yet. In 56 A.D., the apostle Paul wrote that more than
500 persons at the same time saw the Resurrected One, and that most of
them were still alive. (1 Corinthians 15) That the first Christians
were able to invent such a fable and to preach it among those who could
so easily have contradicted them, while producing the body of Jesus
surpasses in my opinion the boundaries of the credibility. An author
said one day: "If Jesus would remain in the tomb, the history of his
life and death would have remained with him".

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s